The executive authorities of the France-British
Exhibition were naturally not so conversant with the exigencies of a great
international sporting meeting as the members of the British Olympic Council,
and they rightly considered the Stadium to be a very valuable asset in
the attractiveness of the Exhibition as a whole, an asset which had eventually
cost quite £6o,ooo, if not more, and which had therefore to be so
worked as to ensure a return at least, if not a fair profit, on the outlay.
It was hoped that everyone who went to see the Exhibition in the latter
half of July would certainly go into the Stadium as well, and also that
many who were first attracted to the Stadium would pass out of it into
the Exhibition. This was a very legitimate and natural hypothesis ; but
it led to the installation of a large number of entrances and turn-stiles
connecting the Stadium with the Exhibition, and to a system of checks and
counterchecks, which occasionally proved annoying to those unfamiliar with
the complicated problem to be solved. It was obvious that people who only
paid a shilling to enter the Exhibition could not be given free admittance
to the Stadium, and that spectators who paid to see the sports could not
thereby claim uncontrolled admittance to the Exhibition. On the other hand,
the mere proximity of the Exhibition to the Stadium was an advantage which
everyone connected with the Games was ready
to appreciate,

for it not only enabled the athletes, the
officials, and the spectators to fill up pauses in the programme with profitable
and delightful visits to the sights outside, but it gave them facilities
in such buildings as the Imperial Sports Club or the Garden Club for rest,
refreshment, and inter-communication which could never have been so luxuriously
provided within the building that itself contained the arena of the sports.
The arrangement of the safeguards necessary for the proper enjoyment of
these facilities was necessarily quite novel and unprecedented ; and it
will therefore be permissible to say that it occasionally showed signs
of wear and tear, and sometimes broke down almost completely. But on the
whole the extremely complicated organisation worked efficiently enough,
and its deficiencies were more hardly felt by the casual spectator than
either by the athletes or the officials of the Games ; and since this Record
is primarily connected with the Games, and only secondarily with the Exhibition
in so far as the two came into contact, I may dismiss in these pages the
question of the spectators with very few remarks indeed. In the first place
it was discovered that the advantage, imagined by foreign critics to be
the pre-eminent asset of London's Games, namely, our national love of sport,
turned out, curiously enough, to be rather harmful than otherwise to the
Stadium attendances. The reason was that we are so accustomed, as a nation,
to attend innumerable sporting meetings of every description all through
the year that the addition of one more to the crowded calendar was at first
scarcely understood. The Boat-race, the Derby, the Final Cup Tie, the great
matches of the Cricket-season, the University Sports, the Amateur Athletic
Championships, Henley Regatta, and many fixtures more, were to be seen
as easily in 1908 as in any other year, and they attracted no fewer crowds
of every class in that year than they did before. Apart, therefore, from
all questions of time and money, it must be remembered that we were offering
only one more entertainment to a public already nearly sated with such
shows, and to a nation which
only began to realise the extraordinary nature
of the Games themselves when they were nearly over. The meeting was never
adequately advertised by the Exhibition authorities, who must have thought
they needed no advertisement, and the prices of the seats were at first
placed so high that whole blocks remained empty.
This was a matter, of course, in which the
British Olympic Council could not unduly press their views, for they took
the Stadium as a gift from the Exhibition authorities, and were naturally
obliged to allow those authorities a fairly free hand in the methods they
chose to recoup themselves for their expenditure. But it soon became obvious
that prices which ranged from £8. 8s. for a box on the opening day
to 2s. 6d. for an upper row any morning other than the first or last were
much too high, even for the western side along the swimming-bath ; and
though prices were originally given at 6d. for standing room on the east
side, the other seats on that side were at first also fixed at much too
high a figure. The lack of advertisement seriously affected advance bookings,
and the rain of the first week discouraged even Londoners from coming in
large numbers. Nor could appeals in the newspapers after the Games began
convince the public that only a fortnight was given them for seeing the
greatest athletic gathering in the history of the world. Yet on Marathon
Day at least 9o,ooo persons were in the Stadium looking on, and those outside
were offering from 10s. to £5 for a seat.
A total of at least 300,000 persons must
have seen the Games in all, which means more in England than, for instance,
it might do in Athens, where the whole available population within reach
of the sports came to see them every day. The English audience, on the
whole, changed from day to day, with a few notable exceptions, and we may
therefore consider that in spite of every difficulty a creditable proportion
of our population saw the Games of 1908, in so far as those carried out
in the Stadium are concerned. And I am not taking into account now either
the spectators who witnessed all the Olympic events in other places during
the year, or the enormous crowd that watched the Marathon Race all the
way from Windsor to the very gates of the Stadium.
(Source document: Official
Report 1908, page 389) |